FRIDAY MORNING SYMPOSIUM 2 (F1SP2): 10.45 AM - 12.15 PM
SafePath, a Schema Therapy Based Program for Teams and Organizations: Implementation and First Research Findings in the Netherlands
by David Bernstein, Bo Bach, John Philip Louis, Robert Brockman, Marjolein van Wijk-Herbrink and Theodoor de Kraker
SafePath (www.SafePath-Solutions.com) combines principles and practices of Schema Therapy and Positive Psychology to working with teams and organizations. It uses a systemic approach to promote change at different levels: individual (e.g., the patient), dyadic (e.g., the patient and a group worker on a ward), a team (e.g., a team working on a forensic, addiction, or psychiatric ward, a school, or the community), and an entire organization.
The central concept in SafePath is schema modes, fluctuating emotional states that dominate a person’s thinking, feeling, and coping behavior at a given moment. In SafePath, we teach teams to recognize and work with schema modes in organizational settings (e.g., on a ward).
Teams use a three-step process, which incorporates mindful acceptance, to work with modes: 1) observe the mode, 2) notice and accept your own modes (“recruiting your Healthy Adult mode”), rather than reacting to the patient’s mode, and 3) chose the correct intervention that matches the patient’s mode. We teach teams how to apply the Schema Therapy techniques of limited reparenting, empathic confrontation, and limit setting to group settings, where interventions often must be carried out quickly in complex living spaces (e.g., on an open ward with many other patients present).
We also use the schema mode approach to analyze and resolve complex dynamics, such as conflicts within the team, or dysfunctional interactions between the team and the patients, or the team and management. We use the iModes cards (www.i-Modes.com) as a medium to facilitate understanding of, and communication about, schema modes, both within teams and with patients.
We have trained more than 20 SafePath teams, and 33 SafePath trainer/coaches, in the Netherlands, with demand continuing to grow. In this symposium, we discuss our experiences in implementing SafePath in different settings, and present the first research findings supporting its use.
Title: Implementing SafePath on Two Wards for the Highest Risk Youth Forensic Patients in the Netherlands: Lessons Learned
Presenters: David Bernstein
Several years ago, the Netherlands Ministry of Justice asked me to help them set up two new wards for the highest risk, most treatment-resistant youth forensic patients. We used SafePath to train these two teams, known as “ITA’s” (Individual Trajectory Departments). The wards have a very high staff to patient ratio and offer mostly one-to-one interactions with personnel, due to the high risk of aggressive incidents. In addition to applying SafePath on the wards, we trained therapists at these institutions to provide individual Schema Therapy. Lesson 1 – A consistent schema mode approach can resolve dysfunctional team dynamics. We observed many destructive patterns on the wards affecting the teams. Psychopathic patients would conspire together, using pressure, bullying, and manipulation to get the staff to submit to their wishes (e.g., for leave privileges). In response to the modes of the patients, the teams developed dysfunctional modes. For example, the patients set the team members against each other (“splitting the treatment team”), or the team began to exhibit the same aggressive and manipulative modes seen in the patients (“parallel process”). We confronted the team during biweekly coaching sessions, using the iModes cards to analyze and eventually resolve these destructive dynamics. Lesson 2 – Proper conditions need to be maintained for the ongoing implementation of SafePath. High staff turnover without prompt replacement and training, and the discontinuation of the coaching sessions, led the teams to resume their old patterns. When the proper conditions for SafePath were re-established, the teams returned to higher levels of functioning. Outcomes - Following successful implementation, nearly all of the patients agreed to follow individual Schema Therapy (after first refusing to do so), and many were transitioning to the community. In the periods of the teams’ best functioning, there were no serious incidents on either of the wards
Title: SafePath in Court-Mandated, Secure Residential Youth Care: Empirical Findings and Clinical Impressions
Presenter: Dr. Marjolein van Wijk-Herbrink
Group care workers of residential youth care settings face the challenge of creating a warm and involved treatment climate against the demands and restrictions of the treatment setting. SafePath supports staff to create and maintain such an open group climate for patients with aggression, addiction, and antisocial behavior. This presentation provides a clinical impression of SafePath in secure residential youth care in the Netherlands, the OG Heldering stichting, and addresses a research study we conducted to test the effects of SafePath during the first year of implementation on two secure residential treatment units compared to two control units (“care-as-usual”). Patients were assigned to the two kinds of wards using a naturalistic design depending on the availability of beds. Staff’s daily reports on 139 individual patients were coded on use of schema mode language (implementation check), occurrences of aggression (primary outcome), and repressive staff interventions. In addition, repeated questionnaires were filled out by patients (n = 87) on group climate and by staff (n = 50) on team functioning. The SafePath teams made significantly more use of the schema mode terminology in their daily reports compared to the care-as-usual teams, with increasing use over the course of the year. Compared to the care-as-usual units, the two SafePath units showed better team functioning, better climate on the wards, and less need for repressive staff interventions, such as physical restraints. Aggression decreased on all wards and was not significantly different between the two kinds of wards. This study is the first to support the notion that SafePath produce better team functioning, ward climate, and lessen the need for repressive, physical staff interventions.
Title: Adaptation of SafePath to a Dual Diagnosis Addiction Unit: Developing and Testing of a Novel Group Program Based on SafePath Principles
Presenters: Theodoor de Kraker
“De Hoop” (“The Hope”) is a Christian-faith based addiction treatment center that has successfully implemented SafePath over the past several years. This presentation describes a novel group therapy program that is being implemented on a new SafePath ward for dual diagnosis patients, most of whom have personality disorders or axis I disorders (e.g., depression, PTSD) in addition to substance or alcohol addiction. The patients on this closed ward reside for 12 weeks while they follow an intensive group therapy program. Of special interest is the development (by Theodoor de Kraker and David Bernstein) of three types of SafePath groups for the patients on the ward: a three-session Introduction Group that provides an introduction to SafePath; a 12-session Basic Group, covering a range of schema modes; and a 12-session Healthy Adult Group, focusing on strengthening the Healthy Adult mode. All of the groups combine a psycho educational approach and experiential exercises adapted from SafePath and Schema Therapy. The groups use the iModes cards and other recently developed SafePath materials for the exercises. For example, the central metaphor of a sailboat representing a person’s life journey (Alberts, 2018) is incorporated in the very first of the session of the Introduction Group, providing a thread that links the various group components. Many of the sessions incorporate mindful awareness (termed “attentional awareness” in this program) or guided imagery exercises, and fun and playful “serious games” to engage patients as they learn about modes. Patients also keep a daily diary that they use to monitor their schema modes and introduce healthy awareness and choices into their daily routine. In this presentation, we will describe the group program, our clinical experiences with the first cohort of patients to experience it, and the design of an open clinical trial, which is testing its effectiveness.
Dr. Bo Bach is advanced-level schema therapist and ISST accredited trainer/supervisor. He is a clinical psychologist and holds a Ph.D. in Psychiatry from the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen. He works as a part-time clinician and part-time senior research associate at the Center for Personality Disorder Research (CPDR), Psychiatric Hospital in Slagelse, Denmark. Beyond schema therapy, his major interest is classification of personality disorders and its implications for conceptualization, treatment planning, and therapy. Dr. Bach is consultant for ICD-11 and DSM-5.1 personality disorder workgroups, and he is a member of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) consortium and actively involved in the European Society for the Study of Personality Disorders (ESSPD).
Robert Brockman is a Clinical Psychologist and senior research fellow at the Institute for Positive Psychology and Education,Australian Catholic University. He is alsoprinciple Clinical Psychologist atSchema Therapy Sydney,a Sydneybased psychology clinicfocused on the practice and dissemination of schema therapy.His clinical practice and research has largely focused on the applicability of schema therapy to novel treatment populations (e.g. Eating Disorders, GAD, Psychotic Symptoms), and the integration of 3rd Wave Therapy techniques into Schema Therapy practice
Theodoor de Kraker:
Marjolein van Wijk-Herbrink:
©2020 International Society of Schema Therapy e.V.
International Society of Schema Therapy e.V. is a not-for-profit organization. Glossop-Ring 35, DE-61118 Bad Vilbel, Germany